Can You Sell Copies Of Car Repair Manuals
By Bob Solak on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - x:05 am: I suppose this is a little OT because it concerns a non-Ford vehicle, but I guess the discussion could bear on the Model T.
I recently purchased a 1938 Graham. Graham was one of the independents that took lumps during the Depression, ceased during WWII (the constitute shifted to state of war work), and they produced ane concluding model later the war. In 1947 they transferred all automotive assets to Kaiser-Frazer.
Anyway, that is the timeline.
My issue is that I'chiliad trying to notice a owners/shop manual for the auto. All I've found so far is one for $150. And that seems a little excessive (I'thousand a cheap T guy at heart, I suppose). I've been able to locate a copy that I am trying to get a hold of through inter-library loan. If I become it on loan, I was thinking I would scan it in a non-destructive way for my own employ. My question, though, since these things are rare, is: can I distribute my digital scanned copy to anyone else who finds them-self in the same predicament? Evidently that is where the copyright question comes into play. I'm not looking to sell the scanned version - simply to help out others who can't find the books either.
I've read a fleck about copyright expiration and how authors can extend the copyright. The matter that makes it difficult to pinpoint when this manual will go into the public domain is that there is probably non one author - it was produced by a corporate entity. And did the entity "dice" when they sold off the automotive assets? Did Kaiser-Frazer then become the "author". And what if Kaiser-Frazer never really died merely morphed into something that isnt' a car company whatever more, only the corporate entity still exists?
Short question is: does anyone know if/when such a manual, written in the late thirties, would enter the public domain?
By Henry Petrino in Modesto, CA on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 10:18 am: I constitute this on Nolo Law online. I don't know how authentic it is, but it's a start:
Has the Copyright Expired?
To determine whether a work is in the public domain and available for utilise without the author'south permission, you first accept to notice out when it was published. And so, use the post-obit rules to encounter if the copyright has expired:
Copyrights of all works published in the United States before 1923 have expired; the works are in the public domain.
Works published after 1922, only before 1978, are protected for 95 years from the date of publication. If the piece of work was created, but not published, before 1978, the copyright lasts for the life of the writer plus seventy years.
For works published after 1977, the copyright lasts for the life of the author plus lxx years. Yet, if the work is a work for hire (that is, the work is done in the course of employment or has been specifically deputed) or is published anonymously or under a pseudonym, the copyright lasts between 95 and 120 years, depending on the date the work is published.
Lastly, if the work was published betwixt 1923 and 1963, y'all must check with the U.S. Copyright Office to run into whether the copyright was properly renewed. If the writer failed to renew the copyright, the work has fallen into the public domain and you lot may use it.
By David Dewey, Northward. California on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 12:42 pm: As long as y'all are copying for your ain personal apply, I believe yous are "covered".
Supplying others is some other question--but if you do it for NO compensation, I THINK yous are covered.
I really doubt that anyone picked upwards the Graham rights, simply you lot never know! Orphan cars, at that time, were merely that, Has Beens and few wanted anything to exercise with them.
By John F. Regan on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 12:58 pm: Copying anything for a friend and and then just giving information technology to him is a copyright violation in every sense of the word because the author is being defrauded of his right to be compensated for that re-create. Information technology doesn't matter whether you sold it to him or gave it abroad since the author didn't give it away and it was his belongings. I don't call up in that location is whatever evil intent here only only wanted readers to understand that a pirate re-create of annihilation is a copyright violation if it is not in the public domain and has a copyright on it.
By Dave Wells, Hamilton Ontario on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 12:59 pm: Everywhere you become nowadays, you are filmed and photographed without your consent. Re-create away and accept fun. They should exist glad you lot're keeping the car alive.
By Bob Solak on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 01:32 pm: I found a weblog dated 2022 that says that in five years (2018), the very start Mickey Mouse cartoons circa 1923 (Steamboat Willy) will enter the public domain. That is the 95 year timeline. You can bet the subcontract that Disney has done everything it can to keep the copyright live. So I think that would mean that WORST case, a transmission copyrighted in 1938 should be public domain by 2033.
I suppose if a company revised the manual and updated the copyright in, say, 1941, that the original version would enter the public domain in 2033 and the revised edition in 2036?
From what I tin tell, there MAY be different (shorter) timelines if the author never re-established their rights somewhere along the lines. Merely to find out if Graham ever did so would probably require a copyright search. I've no interest in paying for that.........
Hither is the article, by the mode. It describes the passage of the copyright extension law back in the late xc's. It should surprise no one who the master lobbyists were in back up of the extensions.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/10/25/15-years-ago-congre ss-kept-mickey-mouse-out-of-the-public-domain-will-they-do-information technology-again/
An interesting (fair-utilise 
"Public debate over the last extension has stimulated increased academic research into the economics of the public domain, and as a result, nosotros know a lot more most the costs of longer copyright terms than nosotros did 20 years agone.
I hitting case: a study looked at the availability of books published in the final 200 years on Amazon.com. Surprisingly, the study found that there are more printed books available from the 1880s than the 1980s. When books fall into the public domain, as works from the 1880s have, anyone is free to re-publish them. In contrast, books from the 1980s are still in copyright, so just their original copyright holder tin can give permission to distribute them. Every bit a event, older books are really easier to get online than newer books are. That means that the 1976 and 1998 extensions have deprived a generation of readers of easy access to books from the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s and 1950s."
Past Rick J. Gunter -- Sparta, Missouri, United states of america on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 02:45 pm: I would be willing to bet that Disney volition do everything in its ability to proceed Mickey from e'er going into public domain. They got the copyright law changed a few years dorsum for that reason. They take many lawyers to make sure that Mickey (and other blithe friends) stay under their roof.
My married woman used to work for a souvenir company. The had had continual problems of other companies printing copies of their postcards. They had a legal right to have the other companies to court. Even so, a few postcards certainly did not justify the cost and problem of a constabulary suit. All they did was transport messages to the other visitor request them to "delight" terminate printing and selling their postcards.
Personally I don't retrieve there would be a problem with reprinting a Graham transmission. However, it is in that grayness area and I am not qualified to give legal propose.
Past kep on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 03:29 pm: Put a parrot on your shoulder and copy it. There is no alternative if yous want the info' from information technology every bit other copies do not exist.
By Garry Potter on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 05:55 pm: I take a Graham owners's manual for the Crusader Series 80. There is no appointment on the manual but I believe information technology is mid 30's. It is in mint condition and I program to sell it at the adjacent flea market. Would you lot exist interested in purchasing.
Garry 705 487-1788
By Gary H. White - Sheridan, MI on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 06:01 pm: Well lets meet, Graham Paige to Willys-Overland to Willys Motors to Kaiser-Fraser to Kaiser Jeep to American Motors to AM General (Humvee).
Maybe with todays computerized records some corporate flunky would take the fourth dimension to research the archives to find the original paperwork proving copyright ownership. Merely I doubt it. Go for it.
By Bob Solak on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 06:05 pm: @ Garry
Thanks, but I'll demand the Model 97, that came out in 1938.
By Hal Davis-SE Georgia on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 07:26 pm: I'm no lawyer, so I can't speak for what's LEGAL. Withal, I Volition say what I think makes COMMON SENSE, and yes, I know that is 2 totally dissimilar things. If the company is no longer publishing the thing, what are they losing if someone copies information technology? Copying one simply hurts those that are trying to sell an original copy. To me, there is a large divergence betwixt selling a pirated copy of software or a movie that the buyer might otherwise buy legitimately and selling a re-create of something that the original author doesn't sell anymore and has no intention of e'er doing so.
By Mack Cole ---- Earth on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 08:03 pm: Copy right laws and the high prices on music and books it causes is why I buy my stuff at flea markets and yard sales. I have not watched a "latest" pic in years. I picket them on .25 vhs and 1.00 dvd
I would re-create the manual and allow the folks know where the orignal can be establish if I was really worried about a 91 year old Graham Ceo coming later on me with a courtroom document.
By Mack Cole ---- Earth on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 08:04 pm: And 1 more detail, I do remember back in the tardily 80's when I got my showtime car,I could go to Crazy Joe'south machine parts and they had a technical manual library and a copy car. You could copy the section you needed and go home and practise the work.
By Erik Johnson on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 08:21 pm: Folks have been photocopying and passing around antique automobile literature since the hobby began more than 75 years ago.
If it weren't for that and the copy service provided by the Detroit Public Library, a lot of folks with antique cars, particularly rarer makes, would be SOL.
By Ted Dumas on Tuesday, April 28, 2022 - 08:39 pm: Why not buy the manual for $150. Information technology's more than you desire to pay but a drop in the bucket compared to what you will accept invested by the fourth dimension y'all have restored the car. Your time to copy and print a re-create with your figurer and scanner is worth something.
As for making a copy or pages for someone, how many people demand info on a 1938 Graham. If you demand to assistance someone out, rather than supplying him a re-create, mayhap the pages could magically appear in his mailbox i twenty-four hours.
By Bob Solak on Tuesday, Apr 28, 2022 - 10:41 pm: @Ted,
If I tin become the volume from the library and browse it with already owned equipment, then that is $150 to spend on automobile parts!
And speak of the devil, I only got an electronic mail from my library that the book is waiting for me! Awesome!
By Fred Dimock, Newfields NH, USA on Wednesday, Apr 29, 2022 - 06:30 am: Copy-write?
I am in People's republic of china and everyone hither understands what that is.
I went to the Shanghai Science and Engineering science center and got an official copy of a Tumi carry on bag.
I know that it is an official copy because that is what they said it is.
When they said that it was an official copy I asked if it was real and they said yes it is a real official re-create.
They wanted 600 for it only I talked them downwardly to 100 which is virtually $17.00e
I virtually bought a Rolex for 100 but figured that information technology was a chip overpriced and did non want to gothru the hassle of talking the guy down
DVD's and software is even more fun. One can get whatever movie for 5 and Windows vii with license for 10. That is $.85 and $1.70.
By Bob Solak on Wed, April 29, 2022 - 03:56 pm: The plot thickens a piddling bit.
Starting time off, the transmission I got from the library is for 1935-1937, so not the 1938. Still, there is a paragraph pasted onto the first page (same typeface, and obviously every bit old as the manual) that says it too covers the 1938-40 models as they are "mechanically almost the aforementioned".
Then non quite the abode run I was looking for, it should serve for nigh things I approximate.
But, to bring it back to the OT, the volume has no copyright indication anywhere in it.
So......what does that mean?
By Hal Davis-SE Georgia on Wednesday, April 29, 2022 - 04:32 pm: Gut feel? Copy it for your own use. Don't tell everyone you did it. Don't start a second job selling repro manuals. If someone else needs a manual and you trust them, permit them borrow it and don't enquire if they copied it while they had it.
By James A. Gilt on Wed, April 29, 2022 - 04:55 pm: One of my mom'southward cousins wrote a small-scale book on my family history. He died many years ago, simply I establish a copy and wanted one. The copy had the circled C on it, which suggested information technology had been copyrighted about 1946.
Living but 20 miles from the Library of congress, I thought I might learn who owns that copyright now, so I took a trip over at that place.
What I plant was that the fee had never been paid and the volume had never been copyrighted at all.
Then I was told that it did not brand whatever difference, equally the owner or his family all the same had the rights that a copyright would guarantee, if proof could be provided that the piece of work I was using belonged to someone else.
I was also told that the copyright extension provided by more contempo laws did not apply, if the possessor did non apply for the extension. He was dead earlier the extension constabulary was passed and he did not apply. I did get a copy of the book from a state historical gild.
By Thomas Mullin on Midweek, April 29, 2022 - 06:10 pm: Equally I understand Copyright law, yous can make ane re-create for personal use without restriction.
To exist officially copyrighted, yous must spell out the word "Copyright" or use the C in a circle. A C in parentheses is not legit. No engagement and Copyright notice means it is not copyrighted.
I believe in that location is a higher level of penalty if you provide the library of Congress with two copies of the copyrighted work than if y'all simply assert your copyright.
In the one-time days
By Chuck Hoffman - Mokelumne Loma, Calif. on Wednesday, April 29, 2022 - 07:twenty pm: I have never copied anything but I accept found a lot of copied stuff that I needed at flea markets. I don't recollect exactly where or when, just that's where I got them. I promise!
Can You Sell Copies Of Car Repair Manuals,
Source: http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/506218/537290.html?1430349657
Posted by: mullinspriont.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Can You Sell Copies Of Car Repair Manuals"
Post a Comment